ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Association between non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and the risk of gestational diabetes: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have shown an association between non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C)-to-HDL-C ratio (NHHR) and diabetes; however, its impact on pregnant women remains unclear. This study aims to explore the association between NHHR in early to mid-pregnancy and the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods: This study retrospectively collected and analyzed prenatal examination data from pregnant women. Variables were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariable logistic regression, and the association between NHHR and GDM incidence was assessed through sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to reduce selection bias between groups. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the predictive accuracy of NHHR for GDM. Results: The study included 572 pregnant women aged 20-44 years, with a mean age of 31.35 years (standard deviation: 4.02). LASSO and multivariable logistic regression analyses identified NHHR as an independent risk factor for GDM. Despite adjusting for group differences using PSM, NHHR values remained significantly different between groups ( Conclusion: This study suggests that an elevated NHHR is associated with an increased risk of GDM. Early measurement of NHHR could help identify women at risk for GDM, potentially enabling timely interventions to improve pregnancy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.