ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Group-based trajectory modeling for supportive care needs in Chinese cancer survivors: A systematic review.
Review in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peripherally inserted central catheter performance in oncology patients: A retrospective analysis in an outpatient setting.The journal of vascular access · 2026Article
- Symptom burden, healthcare utilization, and risky behaviors in survivors of the childhood cancer survivor study (CCSS): an observation cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to systematically synthesize studies that applied group-based trajectory modeling to examine the trajectories of supportive care needs (SCNs) among cancer survivors and to identify associated influencing factors. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the following databases: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, SinoMed, VIP, and Wanfang. Studies were screened and assessed independently by two reviewers using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cohort Studies and the Guidelines for Reporting on Latent Trajectory Studies (GRoLTS) checklist. Key study characteristics and findings were extracted and synthesized narratively. Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Five distinct SCNs trajectories were identified across studies, including high-stable, moderate-stable, low-stable, decreasing, and increasing patterns. A total of 18 statistically significant influencing factors were identified and categorized according to the five domains of the Social-Ecological Model (SEM). Most factors were related to demographic characteristics, clinical variables, and individual symptoms. Conclusions: SCNs trajectories among cancer survivors exhibit substantial heterogeneity. While individual- and disease-level factors are commonly reported, limited evidence exists regarding the role of social support, healthcare system factors, and community-level influences. Future research should incorporate broader socio-environmental determinants to enhance understanding of SCNs patterns and inform tailored survivorship care. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024586557.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.