Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678760›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

An exploration of the editing cut as an articulator in film through frequency domain analysis of spectator EEGs.

Javier Sanz-Aznar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Javier Sanz-AznarSection of Communication, Department of Hispanic Studies, Literary Theory and Communication, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study explores if the cinematographic cut can be considered an articulation axis between different units, which are adjacent shots. The theoretical premise of the research was that if the shot change functions as a point of articulation that produces a connection between different units, two conditions must be met: first, all types of editing cuts should elicit common neural patterns; and second, these neural patterns triggered to make sense of the shot change should exhibit variations depending on the specific type of cut. Methods: To achieve this objective, building on the theoretical foundations of cinematographic language and integrating methodologies from cognitive neuroscience, the study analyzed neural responses triggered by continuity editing cuts through electroencephalography recordings from 21 participants. Results: To determine it, the frequency domain of spectators' neural recordings were analyzed for common event-related desynchronization/synchronization patterns. The analysis revealed neural responses patterns in theta synchronization and delta desynchronization, which are associated with memory encoding, narrative segmentation, and meaning construction. Discussion: Moreover, the results suggests that shot changes are cognitively processed as relational events, not merely as new perceptual inputs. These findings support the hypothesis that the shot change by cut is neurally processed as an articulatory mechanism within film structure.

Indexed as

cinemacinematographic languagecuteditingEEGERD/ERSfilmneurocinematics

Identifiers

PMID40678760
PMCPMC12267235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.