Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678749›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2025

Co-creating and disseminating substance use and vaping educational videos, question prompt lists, and other resources in partnership with community organizations and youth in Western North Carolina.

Betsy Sleath, Abena A Adjei, Jeremy Lowery, Mckenna Knock, Bethany Beznos, Delesha M Carpenter, Casey R Tak, Kim James, Michelle Geiser, Nacire Garcia and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Betsy SleathDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abena A AdjeiDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jeremy LoweryDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Mckenna KnockDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Bethany BeznosDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Delesha M CarpenterDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Casey R TakDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Kim JamesBLiNK Innovations, Morganton, NC, USA.
Michelle GeiserHope Coalition, Henderson County, NC, USA.
Nacire GarciaDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Charles LeeAlexor LLC, Morrisville, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To co-design resources to empower youth to ask questions about vaping and substance use and to disseminate the developed materials in Western North Carolina. Methods: Two youth advisory boards were formed in Western North Carolina in partnership with two community organizations. Focus groups were conducted with youth, parents, and other stakeholders on what resources to design and how to disseminate them. Dissemination utilized a three-pronged approach which included emailing organizations, in-person events, and social media campaigns. Website analytics were measured utilizing Google Analytics. The intrinsic analytics from X and Instagram were also tracked. Results: Eleven videos about vaping and substance use were developed along with question prompt lists, a trivia game, and a toolkit for use by educators. There were 1175 impressions on X, and the substance use and vaping content posted on Instagram reached 581 accounts during the dissemination period. The substance use and vaping videos were viewed over 500 times during the dissemination period. Over 10,000 students in Western North Carolina were reached through in-person events. Conclusion: Videos and other resources on the prevention or cessation of substance use and vaping were created and disseminated using a three-pronged approach. The co-designed materials can be used by youth to empower them to ask health care providers, educators, and other adults questions about vaping and substance use. Innovation: The vaping and substance use resources were developed for youth by youth. The materials were placed on a website where individuals can anonymously go to learn more about these topics.

Indexed as

AdolescentQuestion-askingQuestion prompt listsSubstance useToolkittrivia gameVapingVideosYouth

Identifiers

PMID40678749
PMCPMC12268774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.