Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678743›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Efficacy of Topical Steroid Ointment in Treating Phimosis: A Review of Clinical Practice.

Patrick A Dewan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Patrick A DewanPediatric Surgery, Pediatric Urology Unit, Northern Private Hospital, Melbourne, AUS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTopical steroids as first-line treatment for phimosis are well established, but both the accurate diagnosis of pathological phimosis and the regimen of use of steroid ointment are not widely known, as judged by a review of referrals to a specialist clinic.

objectiveThis study aims to determine the proportion of patients with an accurate diagnosis of phimosis and appropriate use of steroid treatment prior to specialist referral for phimosis. MATERIALS AND

methodsRetrospective data were collected for 781 boys with a mean age of 11.8 ± 0.22 years, including the reason for general practitioner referral, previous use of topical steroids, and specialist management.

resultsSix hundred patients were referred with a diagnosis of phimosis; 181 were referred with an alternative diagnosis. Only 218 boys had pre-referral steroid treatment. Conservative therapy was used for 614 patients, of whom 489 received topical steroid ointment. Circumcision or dorsal slit procedures were required for failed medical management in 95.

conclusionsMost boys with phimosis are cured with the use of an appropriate topical steroid; however, very few have steroid ointment as part of their care prior to referral.

Indexed as

circumcisionforeskinphimosisprepucesteroid treatment

Identifiers

PMID40678743
PMCPMC12268225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.