ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2025
Insertional torque and pullout strength of reinserted screws for sacroiliac joint fusion: Effects of implant dimensions, bone density, and tapping.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contralateral screw loosening of through-and-through fixation following unilateral sacroiliac joint fusion: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion is a common procedure for SIJ pain and dysfunction. Traditional threaded screws offer limited bony integration, prompting the development of additively manufactured, porous implants aimed at enhancing osseointegration. However, data on their insertional mechanics and pullout strength, especially in revision scenarios, remain sparse. This study aimed to investigate the influence of bone density, tapping, and implant size on re-insertional torque and pullout strength. Methods: Mechanical testing was conducted in accordance with ASTM F543, using 10 and 20 PCF polyurethane foam blocks to simulate low and normal-density bone, respectively. A 10 × 35 mm screw fusion device served as the control. For subsequent tests, the 10 × 35 mm screw was removed, and various diameters (10, 11.5, 13.5 mm) and lengths (35, 40, 45 mm) were reinserted under 2 conditions: direct and with tapping. The maximum and final insertional torque, as well as the maximum pullout force, were measured. ANOVA techniques with pairwise comparison and Pearson correlation tests were performed (α = 0.05). Results: Significant effects and interactions were observed for implant size, bone density, and tapping. Larger implant diameter and length were associated with significantly greater insertional torque and pullout strength compared to controls, though excessively large diameters yielded diminishing returns in normal-density bone. Independent of size and tapping, normal-density bone consistently demonstrated greater insertional torque (929.1 ± 6.5 vs. 235.0 ± 6.5N·cm) and pullout strength (1,331.2 ± 14.8 vs. 457.3 ± 14.6 N) than low-density bone (p < .001). Independent of size, tapping improved insertional torque (+33.9%; p < .001) and pullout strength (+108.4%; p < .001) in normal-density bone but reduced pullout strength in low-density bone (-22.4%; p < .001). Final insertional torque strongly correlated with pullout strength (r = 0.946, p < .001). Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence-based insight for optimizing implant selection and surgical technique in revision SIJ fusion procedures using screw fusion devices. Particularly, it is emphasized that both implant dimensions and patient-specific bone quality must be considered to achieve stable and successful outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.