ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2025
Can artificial intelligence in spine imaging affect current practice? Practical developments and their clinical status.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Spine Neuroimaging: Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility of Novel Biomarkers in Lower Back Pain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As artificial intelligence (AI) increases its footprint in spine imaging, gauging the clinical relevance of new developments poses an increasingly difficult challenge, especially given the majority of developments reflect experimental or early work. With this summary of available AI tools, focusing on those in clinical use, the benefits of AI in spine imaging are explained for radiologists and surgeons to understand the current state of and potentially the decision to adopt AI in clinical practice. Methods: Through a narrative review of publications relating to "artificial intelligence" and "spine imaging" in the PubMed database, this article provides an update on AI applications in spine imaging being utilized in current clinical practice. Results: Current applications of AI in spine imaging range from deep learning image reconstruction and denoising, spine segmentation and biometry, radiological report generation, surgical outcomes prediction, surgical planning, to intraoperative assistance. Developments in deep learning reconstruction (DLR) are most mature and demonstrate improvements to imaging speed and interpretability compared to non-AI alternatives. While clinical implementations exist in other use cases, their performance remains either an area of active investigation or comparable to the level of a human. Conclusions: Uses of AI in spine imaging span multiple applications with early clinical implementation in most areas, suggesting a promising future ahead.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.