Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678668›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025

Variable Relative Biological Effectiveness of Protons in the Rat Spinal Cord: Measurements and Comparison With Model Calculations.

Christin Glowa, Maria Saager, Lisa Hintz, Rosemarie Euler-Lange, Peter Peschke, Stephan Brons, Kaya Hilt, Thomas Friedrich, Michael Scholz, Hans Liew and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christin GlowaDepartment of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Maria SaagerDepartment of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Lisa HintzDepartment of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Rosemarie Euler-LangeDepartment of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter PeschkeDepartment of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Stephan BronsNational Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
Kaya HiltDepartment of Biophysics, Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research (GSI), Darmstadt, Germany.
Thomas FriedrichDepartment of Biophysics, Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research (GSI), Darmstadt, Germany.
Michael ScholzDepartment of Biophysics, Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research (GSI), Darmstadt, Germany.
Hans LiewNational Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
Andrea MairaniNational Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian P KargerDepartment of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in the rat spinal cord after 6 fractions of protons as a function of linear energy transfer (LET) and dose. Methods and Materials: The rat spinal cord was irradiated at 4 different positions of a 6 cm spread-out Bragg peak using 6 fractions of protons (LET: 1.4, 2.7, 3.9, and 5.5 keV/µm). Dose-response curves were established for the endpoint paresis grade 2, and the RBE was calculated based on the dose at 50% effect probability. Including data with single and split doses, the measured RBE values were compared with predictions from 4 mechanistic, 3 phenomenological, and 2 patient-derived variable RBE models. Results: With increasing LET, the dose at 50% effect probability decreased from 51.3 Gy to 43.3 Gy, resulting in a rise in the RBE from 1.11 to 1.32. The biologically equivalent dose decreased markedly between the 2 proximal and 2 distal spinal cord positions, resulting in extrapolated maximum RBE values of up to 1.87 in the limit of zero dose per fraction. The α/β values ranged between 1.5 Gy and 4.2 Gy. At 3.9 and 5.5 keV/µm, the RBE increased with decreasing dose, and at 1.8 Gy per fraction, the RBE was extrapolated to 1.40 and 1.42, respectively. The agreement between predicted and measured RBE varied between the different models. Conclusions: A fixed RBE of 1.1 provides a good approximation up to the center of the spread-out Bragg peak; however, at 3 mm from the distal end, the RBE increases markedly and may reach values above 1.4 at clinical fraction schedules. Using predictions from a variable RBE model may, therefore, be reasonable; however, the model and model parameters should be carefully selected, ideally as a consensus among the proton therapy centers.

Identifiers

PMID40678668
PMCPMC12269397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.