Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678647›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

The impact of nirsevimab prophylaxis on RSV hospitalizations: a real-world cost-benefit analysis in Tuscany, Italy.

Vieri Lastrucci, Martina Pacifici, Giorgia Alderotti, Monia Puglia, Elettra Berti, Federica Barbati, Lorenzo Lodi, Silvia Boscia, Francesco Nieddu, Giuseppe Indolfi and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Vieri LastrucciEpidemiology Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy.
Martina PacificiEpidemiologic Observatory, Regional Healthcare Agency of Tuscany, Florence, Italy.
Giorgia AlderottiEpidemiology Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy.
Monia PugliaEpidemiologic Observatory, Regional Healthcare Agency of Tuscany, Florence, Italy.
Elettra BertiNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy.
Federica BarbatiPediatrics and Neonatology Unit, Santo Stefano Hospital, USL Toscana Centro, Prato, Italy.
Lorenzo LodiDepartment of Neurofarba, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Silvia BosciaImmunology Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy.
Francesco NiedduImmunology Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy.
Giuseppe IndolfiDepartment of Neurofarba, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Diego PeroniPediatric Clinic, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Marco MartiniPediatric Unit, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy.
Chiara AzzariImmunology Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy.
Fabio VollerEpidemiologic Observatory, Regional Healthcare Agency of Tuscany, Florence, Italy.
Maria MoriondoImmunology Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy.
Silvia RicciImmunology Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is the leading cause of hospitalizations in infants. The approval of nirsevimab, a long-acting monoclonal antibody, has extended the potential for RSV prophylaxis to all infants. This study assesses the cost-benefit of various Nirsevimab prophylaxis strategies for infants during their first RSV season in preventing RSV-associated hospitalization in the Tuscany region, Italy. Methods: The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the healthcare payor. Real-world data from the Tuscany birth cohort ( Results: Under prophylaxis practices at the time of the study, there were a total of 663 hospitalizations associated with RSV, including 102 severe cases, representing €5,247,645 in costs. An extended prophylaxis strategy with nirsevimab, including all infants born both before and during the RSV season, resulted in the highest number of hospitalizations avoided (378), with a BCR close to break-even (0.96). A seasonal-only strategy targeting infants born during the season prevented the fewest hospitalizations (252), showing a positive BCR of 1.15. Finally, a seasonal strategy with targeted catch-up, including also preterm infants born before the season, yielded the highest cost-benefit ratio (1.56), preventing 270 hospitalizations. Conclusion: Universal prophylaxis strategies with nirsevimab, targeting all infants during their first RSV epidemic season, substantially reduce hospitalization burdens without increasing economic pressure on the healthcare system. Although alternative strategies are more cost-effective, they prevent fewer hospitalizations, emphasizing the public health value of broader prophylaxis approaches.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntiviral AgentsHospitalizationRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornItalyMalePalivizumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntiviral AgentsPalivizumabcost–benefit analysishospitalizationsimmunizationnirsevimabpreventionrespiratory syncytial virus (RSV)

Identifiers

PMID40678647
PMCPMC12267333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.