ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Robotic-assisted Supermicrosurgery in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Dedicated Robotic-Assisted Microsurgery Platforms in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review.Microsurgery · 2026Pooled it
- Robotics in facial plastic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the latest trends and innovations.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Global research trends in robotic applications in plastic surgery: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Global research trends and thematic evolution in robotic microsurgery and supermicrosurgery: a bibliometric and visualisation study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- [A brief discussion on microsurgery techniques and free perforator flaps for wound repair].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026Article
- Real-time digital assistance improves surgeon efficiency and autonomy in robotic microvascular anastomosis: a pilot feasibility study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Redefining Reconstruction: Technological Innovations in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Robotic microsurgery is rapidly changing the surgical landscape by mitigating conventional hand-surgical limitations such as physiological tremor while promoting increased precision in confined spaces through the provision of high-depth microoptics and motion-scaling. The innovation of specialized "super" microsurgical robotic platforms such as Medical Microinstruments' Symani and Microsure's MUSA-2 has further bolstered microsurgical toolkits by enabling high-precision microvascular anastomoses in vessels with a diameter of 0.8 mm of less. Methods: Our team conducted a systematic literature review of the global uses of robotic-assisted supermicrosurgery in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses 2020 flow guidelines, our search yielded 107 articles, of which 16 were eligible based on our inclusion criteria. Results: Our results showed that lymphaticovenous anastomoses represent 37% of reported plastic and reconstructive surgery supermicrosurgery robot clinical uses, whereas free flaps and nerve repairs comprised just 14% and 2%, respectively. These procedures were found to correspond with significant but short learning curves. Across studies, mean operating times were found to be up to 1.5 times greater than manual techniques and showed a downward trend in time spent. Our analysis revealed that robotic-assisted techniques decreased rates of microtrauma, with anastomotic patency rates of 99.38%. Conclusions: Although robotic technology represents a significant financial investment and includes training needs, current literature supports evidence of potential long-term net savings due to reliably high patency rates; decreased in-hospital recovery times; the promise of new, expanded surgical options and capabilities; and enhanced career longevity for surgeons.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.