ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports
Identification and experimental validation of Alzheimer's disease hub genes via bioinformatics and machine learning.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder. Objective: To identify diagnostic and predictive biomarkers for AD. Methods: Based on three GEO datasets of human brain tissue from AD patients and controls, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and enrichment analysis were used to identify AD-related gene modules. Hub genes were screened via protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis and three machine learning algorithms. Diagnostic efficacy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Immune cell infiltration and hub gene expression correlations were analyzed using xCell. In vivo validation was performed using an AD mouse model. Results: The magenta module was significantly correlated with AD. PPI network analysis identified 15 AD-related genes, mainly enriched in mitochondria and ribosomes. Two hub genes, DLAT and CCDC88b, were identified. DLAT was significantly downregulated in AD, and CCDC88b was upregulated (p < 0.01); both findings were validated via qPCR in AD model mice. ROC analysis showed good diagnostic performance. Immune infiltration analysis revealed macrophages as the dominant cell type, with hub gene expression associated with immune cell presence. Conclusions: DLAT and CCDC88b are potential novel biomarkers for AD and may serve as targets for therapeutic intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.