Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678553›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Wild

Charlotte Watteyn, Tobias Fremout, Adam P Karremans, Koenraad Van Meerbeek, Steven B Janssens, Sander de Backer, Monika M Lipińska, Bart Muys

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Charlotte WatteynDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Tobias FremoutBioversity International, Lima, Peru.
Adam P KarremansCentro de Investigación Jardín Botánico Lankester, Universidad de Costa Rica, Cartago, Costa Rica.
Koenraad Van MeerbeekDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Steven B JanssensMeise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium.
Sander de BackerMeise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium.
Monika M LipińskaCentro de Investigación Jardín Botánico Lankester, Universidad de Costa Rica, Cartago, Costa Rica.
Bart MuysDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change is expected to drive substantial shifts in species' geographic ranges. Species-specific responses of interacting species, such as plants and their pollinators, may lead to a spatial mismatch in their future distributions, disrupting these interspecific interactions. The crop wild relatives (CWRs) of the tropical cash crop vanilla hold valuable genetic resources for use in crop breeding, but their persistence is dependent on the presence of their pollinators, and at risk due to several anthropogenic pressures including climate change. To contribute to the safeguarding of this wild

Indexed as

climate changeEuglossiniex situ conservationin situ conservationOrchidaceaeplant-pollinator decouplingspecies distribution modelsvanilla crop wild relatives

Identifiers

PMID40678553
PMCPMC12267226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.