Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678548›Full record

ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602025

Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Tofacitinib in a Nationwide Veterans Affairs Cohort of Ulcerative Colitis Patients.

Nabeel Khan, Ramaswamy Sundararajan, Nadim Mahmud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nabeel KhanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5368-7518
Ramaswamy SundararajanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9169-6036
Nadim MahmudDepartment of Gastroenterology, Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1889-3954

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is limited real-world data on the long-term effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib among ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, especially among the elderly. Our aim was to evaluate these parameters among UC patients who had remained on the drug 1 year after initiation of therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, utilizing the US National Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, including patients with UC who received tofacitinib. The primary endpoint was effectiveness at the end of follow-up. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate if the effectiveness was different among the elderly compared to the young. Adverse events associated with the drug, like herpes zoster, major adverse cardiovascular events, deep vein thrombosis, as well as infections and malignancy during follow-up were also assessed. Results: In total, 159 patients were included in the study, among whom 51 were in the elderly group and 108 were in the younger group. The median duration of follow-up was 1.47 years (range, 0.01-5.49 years). Effectiveness of tofacitinib among the cohort was 56.60% (90 out of 159 patients). The effectiveness was higher in the elderly ( Conclusion: In this nationwide cohort of UC patients, the effectiveness of tofacitinib was seen in a little over half the number of patients, with higher rates of effectiveness reported among the elderly. No new safety concerns were raised, especially among the elderly.

Indexed as

biologicseffectivenesssafetytofacitinibulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID40678548
PMCPMC12267814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.