Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678506›Full record

ReviewiScience2025

A systems approach to sustainable finance: Actors, influence mechanisms, and potentially virtuous cycles of sustainability.

Beatrice Crona, Garry Peterson, Megan Meacham, Giorgio Parlato, Steven J Lade, Juan C Rocha, Victor Galaz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Beatrice CronaGlobal Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere Program, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden.
Garry PetersonStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Megan MeachamStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Giorgio ParlatoStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Steven J LadeStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Juan C RochaStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Victor GalazStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, corporate investors have increasingly recognized that responsible environmental and social practices are essential to long-term financial success. Despite growing interest, corporate practices remain largely unchanged, and planetary trends are deeply concerning. This review applies a systems analysis lens to understand how financial sector structures and actors influence sustainability outcomes, often in counterproductive ways. Key barriers include the lack of science-based metrics, poor integration of environmental risks, and limited capacity to evaluate complex system dynamics. Current financial practices frequently miss or misinterpret systemic sustainability risks. We identify three critical areas where collaboration between sustainability science and finance is urgently needed: (1) translating scientific insights into financial decision contexts, (2) supporting science-based corporate sustainability reporting, and (3) strengthening environmental impact assessment. Systems thinking helps clarify where financial leverage can drive meaningful, cross-scale change-an essential step toward aligning capital flows with long-term ecological resilience and sustainability goals.

Indexed as

BusinessEconomicsEnvironmental policy

Identifiers

PMID40678506
PMCPMC12269294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.