ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Evaluation of risk-based antigen and antibody surveillance strategies and their association with HPAI outbreaks in South Korean duck farms.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) continues to threaten the poultry industry, particularly in duck farms, where early detection is critical to preventing widespread outbreaks. In South Korea, risk-based antigen and antibody surveillance strategies have been implemented to enhance early warning capabilities. However, the effectiveness of these strategies-especially in terms of testing frequency, timing, and spatial alignment with outbreak risks-remains under-evaluated. Methods: This study analyzed antigen and antibody surveillance data from South Korean duck farms between 2019 and 2022. Testing frequencies and intervals were assessed across high-risk (October-May) and low-risk (June-September) periods, as well as during non-epidemic (2019-2020) and epidemic (2020-2021 and 2021-2022) seasons. Spatial hotspot analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*) and negative binomial regression were applied to evaluate associations between test patterns and HPAI outbreak occurrence. Additionally, test-to-outbreak intervals were calculated to assess the timeliness of detection. Results: Antigen testing frequencies were significantly associated with HPAI outbreaks during high-risk periods (coefficient = 0.56, IRR = 1.75, Discussion: The findings highlight both the strengths and limitations of South Korea's current HPAI surveillance strategy in duck farms. While antigen testing serves as a useful predictor of outbreak risk, the spatial and temporal mismatch between surveillance intensity and actual outbreak distribution undermines its effectiveness. A more adaptive and geographically targeted testing approach is needed to enhance outbreak preparedness and response. These results provide a foundation for optimizing future surveillance strategies to minimize the economic and public health impacts of HPAI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.