ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025
Rehabilitation robotics and allied digital technologies: opportunities, barriers and solutions for improving their clinical implementation. A position paper from the Fit for Medical Robotics Initiative.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility Evaluation of a Novel Bilateral Hand and Finger Training Device in Patients with Hand Dysfunction: A Preliminary Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Thematic Structure of Clinical Rehabilitation Research in the Early Post-Pandemic Period: An LDA-Based Analysis of Publications from 2022 to 2025.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- PETRA: a pedestal exoskeletal testbed with real-time architecture for upper limb rehabilitation robotics.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Identifying needs in adult rehabilitation to support the clinical implementation of robotics and allied technologies: an Italian national survey.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Clinical evaluation, motor performance and quality of life in patients affected by Soft Tissue Sarcomas undergoing surgical treatment: observational study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotics has been proposed as a promising solution for treating individuals with motor, sensory, and/or cognitive disabilities. Despite the great technological effort put into this field, the translation of robots from the laboratory to the clinical environment is not a seamless and smooth process, and their real-world adoption remains limited. Several barriers to the introduction of robotics in clinical practice have been identified, including a lack of sufficient scientific evidence about its actual cost/effectiveness, resistance to adopting these technologies, and economic, ethical, and regulatory restraints. Fit for Medical Robotics (Fit4MedRob) is an ambitious Initiative designed to bridge the gap between technological innovation and clinical application. One of the main goals of the Initiative is to conduct large-scale pragmatic trials to evaluate the effectiveness and the sustainability of commercially available robotic solutions. To guide the design of these trials, different online surveys have been implemented and delivered to identify the needs of healthcare practitioners and patients at different phases of the disease (acute to chronic) and therapeutic settings (hospital to home care). The results of the Initiative will suggest new organizational models to effectively introduce robotics-assisted rehabilitation into clinical practice. The paper will report on the opportunities of robotics for rehabilitation, the barriers to their clinical implementation, and the proposal of Fit4MedRob to overcome such limitations and facilitate the effective clinical implementation of robotic solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.