Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678479›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2025

SITA: Predicting site-specific immunogenicity for therapeutic antibodies.

Yewei Cun, Hao Ding, Tiantian Mao, Yuan Wang, Caicui Wang, Jiajun Li, Zihao Li, Mengdie Hu, Zhiwei Cao, Tianyi Qiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yewei CunSchool of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Hao DingSchool of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Tiantian MaoSchool of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Yuan WangSchool of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Caicui WangSchool of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Jiajun LiSchool of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Zihao LiSchool of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Mengdie HuSchool of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Zhiwei CaoSchool of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Tianyi QiuInstitute of Clinical Science, Zhongshan Hospital Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity Intelligent Medicine Institute Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody (Ab) humanization is critical to reduce immunogenicity and enhance efficacy in the preclinical phase of the development of therapeutic Abs originated from animal models. Computational suggestions have long been desired, but available tools focused on immunogenicity calculation of whole Ab sequences and sequence segments, missing the individual residue sites. This study introduces Site-specific Immunogenicity for Therapeutic Antibody (SITA), a novel computational framework that predicts B-cell immunogenicity score for not only the overall antibody, but also individual residues, based on a comprehensive set of amino acid descriptors characterizing physicochemical and spatial features for antibody structures. A transfer-learning-inspired framework was purposely adopted to overcome the scarcity of Ab-Ab structural complexes. On an independent testing dataset derived from 13 Ab-Ab structural complexes, SITA successfully predicted the epitope sites for Ab-Ab structures with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-area unver the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.85 and a precision-recall (PR)-AUC of 0.305 at the residue level. Furthermore, the SITA score can significantly distinguish immunogenicity levels of whole human Abs, therapeutic Abs and non-human-derived Abs. More importantly, analysis of an additional 25 therapeutic Abs revealed that over 70% of them were detected with decreased immunogenicity after modification compared to their parent variants. Among these, nearly 66% Abs successfully identified actual modification sites from the top five sites with the highest SITA scores, suggesting the ability of SITA scores for guide the humanization of antibody. Overall, these findings highlight the potential of SITA in optimizing immunogenicity assessments during the process of therapeutic antibody design.

Indexed as

HumanizationImmunogenicityMachine learningTherapeutic antibody

Identifiers

PMID40678479
PMCPMC12268063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.