ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Assisted implant stabilization using a modified microplate fixation technique.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: In many clinical cases, the surgical defect around the osteotomy does not grant sufficient stability which may compromise the inserted dental implant. Using a fixation microplate may solve this issue by improving the stability of the inserted implant. This study aimed to evaluate assisted implant stability using microplate fixation in compromised bone defects. Methods: Two osteotomy defects (6 mm and 4 mm in diameter) were made in the femur of a dog model. Dental implants (4 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length) were placed in the two defects. Microplates were used to enhance the initial stability of the compromised implant placed in the larger defect size without the need for the additional use of a bone graft. A reverse torque test and histomorphometric analysis were performed after eight weeks to assess bone implant contact (n = 48). Results: Both plate and control implants had almost identical bone-to-implant contact ratios, 82.55 ± 0.61 and 82.86 ± 0.69, respectively. The two tested implants had no statistically significant difference in bone implant contact (t = 1.155, Conclusions: Assisted implant stabilization improved osteointegration of implants suffering from poor initial stability without the need to resort to bone graft or other complicated techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.