Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678468›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Advancing cardiac motion estimation with emerging AI techniques for enhanced echocardiographic image registration.

M Rajesh, S Balakrishnan, R Elankavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M RajeshDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission's Research Foundation (DU), Chennai, Tamil Nadu 603104, India.
S BalakrishnanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission's Research Foundation (DU), Chennai, Tamil Nadu 603104, India.
R ElankaviDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission's Research Foundation (DU), Chennai, Tamil Nadu 603104, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring and diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases rely on cardiac motion estimation. The methods used for registering echocardiographic images have drawbacks such as low resolution, noise, and distortion of the anatomy. In order to enhance the prediction of cardiac motion, this research presents an AI-powered architecture that makes use of Vision Transformers, Diffusion Models, and Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF). Adversarial and self-supervised contrastive learning enhance picture quality and generalisability across adult and foetal echocardiography, while a graph neural network (GNN)-based anatomical constraint maintains heart shape. Better, more accurate, more efficient real-time motion tracking without relying on massive labelled datasets is possible with the proposed approach. Cardiac motion analysis in a wide range of patient populations is now therapeutically viable, thanks to this innovative approach that improves echocardiographic picture registration.•Utilizes Vision Transformers, Diffusion Models, and NeRF for high-quality cardiac motion prediction.•Adversarial and self-supervised contrastive learning improve echocardiographic registration across demographics.•A GNN-based anatomical constraint ensures accurate heart morphology during motion analysis.

Indexed as

Cardiac motion estimationDiffusion ModelsHC-IoT Architecture (Holographic Counterpart - Internet of Things Architecture)Image registrationNeural Radiance FieldsSelf-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID40678468
PMCPMC12268573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.