ArticleMethodsX2025
Integrated deep learning for cardiovascular risk assessment and diagnosis: An evolutionary mating algorithm-enhanced CNN-LSTM.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide, emphasizing the urgent need for accurate and efficient predictive models. This study proposes a dual-output deep learning model based on a hybrid Convolutional Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) model, optimized using the Evolutionary Mating Algorithm (EMA). The model predicts both a continuous risk score and a binary diagnostic outcome, supporting both quantitative assessment and early clinical decision-making. EMA was applied for hyperparameter optimization, demonstrating improved convergence and generalization over conventional methods. Performance was benchmarked against CNN-LSTM models optimized using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Barnacle Mating Optimization (BMO). The EMA-based model achieved superior results, with a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.018, Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 0.0006, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.024, and a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.98 for risk prediction. For the diagnostic task, the model attained 70 % accuracy and 80 % precision. These findings validate EMA's effectiveness in tuning dual-output deep learning models and highlight its potential in enhancing cardiovascular risk stratification and early diagnosis in clinical settings.•Dual-output CNN-LSTM model optimized using EMA.•Continuous risk scores and binary diagnostic classification predictions.•EMA outperformed PSO and BMO in predictive accuracy and model robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.