ArticleMethodsX2025
AI-driven pharmacovigilance: Enhancing adverse drug reaction detection with deep learning and NLP.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using Artificial Intelligence to Identify Patterns and Predictors of Adverse Drug Reactions in Cardiovascular Patients: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026Review
- Early prediction and risk assessment of adverse drug combinations using ensemble learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Natural language processing to enhance rheumatoid arthritis care in clinical studies: a scoping review of applications, data, approaches, challenges and future directions.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- A computationally efficient biomedical text processing framework for pharmacovigilance: integrating low-rank adaptation and interpretable AI for adverse drug reaction detection.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in ovarian cancer: transforming detection, treatment, and prevention.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Research on daily medication and drug efficacy evaluation for chronic diseases based on natural language processing (NLP).Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Pharm D student's Knowledge, perception, and practice of CHAT-GPT in clinical training: a web-based cross-sectional survey in India.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the healthcare industry, the ever-increasing volume of clinical trial data presents challenges for ensuring drug safety and detecting adverse drug reactions (ADRs). This study aims to address the challenge of accurately detecting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in pharmacovigilance, a critical component in ensuring drug safety during and after clinical trials. The key problem lies in the underreporting and delayed detection of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) due to the heterogeneous nature of medical data, class imbalance, and the limited scope of traditional monitoring techniques. This study proposes a hybrid AI-driven framework that integrates structured (e.g., patient demographics, lab results) and unstructured data (e.g., clinical notes) to detect ADRs using advanced deep learning and NLP methods. The objective is to outperform traditional signal detection methods and provide interpretable predictions to aid clinicians in real-time. By leveraging advanced Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) techniques, including Random Forests, Gradient Boosting Machines, and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), our model aims to identify potential ADRs across different patient subgroups. Through meticulous feature engineering and the application of techniques to address data imbalance, our model demonstrates improved accuracy and interpretability in predicting ADRs. The CNN model achieved an accuracy of 85 %, outperforming traditional models, such as Logistic Regression (78 %) and Support Vector Machines (80 %). These findings suggest that specific demographic and clinical factors significantly influence the likelihood of adverse reactions, offering valuable insights for targeted monitoring and risk mitigation strategies[11]. This research underscores the potential of predictive modeling to enhance pharmacovigilance efforts and ensure safer clinical trial outcomes.•The research methodology includes a comparison of supervised learning algorithms, such as Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boost, CNN, and genetic algorithms, to identify patterns and anomalies in clinical trial data. BERT and GPT, were also employed to provide the functionality of textual interactions over medical data.•Performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were systematically applied to evaluate each model's performance. Among the models tested, the CNN model with BERT achieved the highest accuracy, providing valuable insights into the potential of deep learning for enhancing pharmacovigilance practices.•These findings suggest that an inclusion of diverse clinical data when supplied to advanced ML and NLP techniques can significantly improve the detection of ADRs, leading to better alignment with the fundamental principles of Good Clinical Practice (GCP).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.