ArticleMethodsX2025
eHealth interventions for chronic pain: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of Digital Health Interventions on Breastfeeding Rates, Self-Efficacy, and Knowledge: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions on Health Outcomes in Adult Patients With Intestinal Stoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.International journal of nursing practice · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic pain is a prevalent and costly condition that significantly impairs functional and emotional status as well as quality of life, representing a major cause of incapacity worldwide that requires long-term management strategies. eHealth interventions, including telemedicine, mobile health applications, and internet-based programs, have emerged as promising approaches to improve pain management by enhancing access to education, psychological support, and self-monitoring tools. However, the efficacy of these interventions remains unclear due to variability in study designs or intervention components, differences in pain conditions (e.g., somatic or neuropathic pain), and outcome measures. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize the evidence on the efficacy of eHealth interventions for chronic non-cancer pain in adults, assessing their impact on pain severity, functional outcomes, quality of life, mental health, medication adherence, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. A network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted to compare different eHealth modalities and identify which features contribute most to positive outcomes. Statistical analyses will follow Cochrane guidelines, with the risk of bias and evidence certainty evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool and GRADE framework, respectively. The findings will provide valuable insights for clinicians, policymakers, and researchers, informing best practices for integrating digital health solutions into chronic pain management.•This systematic review and meta-analysis will assess the efficacy of eHealth interventions for chronic pain management.•A network meta-analysis will compare different digital health modalities to identify the most effective intervention components.•The study will evaluate clinical, functional, psychological, adherence, and cost-related outcomes, informing evidence-based practice and policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.