Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678447›Full record

ReviewMethodsX2025

Predictive modeling of adolescent suicidal behavior using machine learning: Key features and algorithmic insights.

Priya Metri, Swetta Kukreja

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Priya MetriAmity School of Engineering and Technology, Amity University, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Swetta KukrejaAmity School of Engineering and Technology, Amity University, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicidal ideation prevalence among students is a growing concern that requires urgent attention. This review systematically analyzes 28 studies on the application of machine learning techniques for the early detection of suicidal ideation. Among these, Random Forest and SVM emerged as the most commonly used algorithms, featured in 35 % and 27 % of studies respectively. Reported model accuracies ranged from 70 % to 95 %, with deep learning approaches showing slightly higher average precision and recall values. Most studies relied on survey-based data (68 %) and employed PHQ-9 or GAD-7 scales for input features. This review highlights existing gaps in cross-cultural generalization and calls for the development of interpretable and hybrid models for improved risk prediction.This review aims to conduct a comprehensive examination of the etiological factors contributing to the development of suicidal thoughts in students, with the goal of enabling early detection through the application of AI and machine learning techniques.This paper aims to review the current state-of-the-art, highlight the limitations, and emphasizes the need to shift toward hybrid and ensemble deep learning models, which have shown early promise but lack extensive analysis in current literature.

Indexed as

AdolescentArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkDeep learningLong and short-term memoryMachine learningScoping Review MethodSuicidal IdeationXgboost model

Identifiers

PMID40678447
PMCPMC12268932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.