Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678436›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Dimensions of the psychological emptiness and its relation with suicide history among college students.

Xing Hang, Wenqi Lü, Yan Wu, Xudong Kang, Ye Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xing HangBusiness School, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Wenqi LüSleep Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yan WuDepartment of Postgraduate Student, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xudong KangMental Health Education Center, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Ye ZhuSchool of Marxism, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The psychological emptiness (PE) presents a state of emotional emptiness and lack of meaning, and is increasingly relevant in modern society. However, few studies have tried to assess its dimension and suicide history. This study aims to establish the factorial structure of PE and compare its predictive power against a standard depression inventory. Methods: A total of 45,335 university students participated in the study. The 20 items involving lack of purpose, depression, and meaninglessness in life were used to evaluate the PE, alongside the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was employed to identify the structure of the 20 items, while confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to confirm the construct validity of the model. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the predictive relationship between the identified factors and suicide history. Results: EFA identified a three-factor structure: Depression and Self-Harm/Suicidal Tendencies (DST), Life Meaning and Purpose (LMP), and Study Motivation (SM). The three factors accounted for 23.1, 12.6, and 11.9% of the total variance, respectively. CFA confirmed the construct validity of the model, which showed acceptable fit indices and high internal consistency (Cronbach's Conclusion: The present study provides a comprehensive framework for understanding PE. The PE may include three psychological dimensions, while DST is a strong predictor of suicide history.

Indexed as

behaviorpsychiatrypsychologicalpsychopatalogysuicide

Identifiers

PMID40678436
PMCPMC12269772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.