ArticleEJVES vascular forum2025
Proximal Relining with Custom Made Double Branch Aortic Arch Graft to treat a type Ia Endoleak after Zone 2 Branched TEVAR.
Article in EJVES vascular forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) including a branch or fenestration offers a less invasive alternative to open surgery in the treatment of aortic arch pathologies. Nevertheless, the occurrence of a proximal type I endoleak (EL) in this specific setting may be particularly challenging to fix. This study presents the case of a type Ia endoleak after a zone 2 single branched TEVAR that was successfully treated with a proximal endovascular relining using a custom made double branch aortic arch graft. Case: A 74 year old male presented with a 70 mm thoracic aortic aneurysm and a type Ia EL 7 years after a zone 2 TEVAR including a retrograde left subclavian artery branch. After multidisciplinary discussion, the patient underwent a hybrid repair with left carotid subclavian bypass and a custom made double branch aortic arch graft to extend proximal sealing into zone 0. The device that was used featured two antegrade inner branches for the brachiocephalic trunk and left common carotid artery. Post-operatively, the patient recovered well without neurological deficit. Follow-up imaging at three months confirmed patency of the supra-aortic trunks and favourable aortic remodelling without any residual endoleak. Conclusion: This case suggests that proximal endovascular relining in zone 0 with a custom made double branch aortic arch for treating type Ia endoleak following left subclavian artery branch endograft is feasible and effective in experienced aortic centres.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.