ArticleEJVES vascular forum2025
Strategies for Antithrombotic Management During Non-cardiac Arterial Procedures: Results of the International ACTION Survey.
Article in EJVES vascular forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Re-Thinking Antithrombotic Strategies in Non-Cardiac Arterial Procedures: Time for Standardisation?EJVES vascular forum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Peri-procedural antithrombotics are used extensively to prevent thromboembolic complications during non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP) worldwide. However, there is a lack of evidence to support recommendations on antithrombotic strategies, possibly leading to substantial variation in local practices. A comprehensive overview of antithrombotic strategies is needed to identify the most widely accepted protocols employed during NCAP, highlight variations in local practices, and identify new research targets to establish evidence based peri-procedural anticoagulation management. Methods: An international, web based survey study was conducted from March to October 2023, targeting vascular clinical specialists who applied antithrombotic strategies during NCAP in daily practice. Results: The survey was completed by 436 vascular clinical specialists from 45 countries (Europeans: 93%, vascular surgeons or vascular surgery residents: 98%). Systemic unfractionated heparin was used by nearly all vascular specialists during all procedures (varying between 98-99%, depending on the procedure type), but could vary depending on specific NCAP. A fixed starting dose (39-52%, most often 5 000 IU [80-89%]) or an actual bodyweight dependent dose (42-52%, most commonly 100 IU/kg [40-67%] or 50 IU/kg [17-40%]) was mainly used. Except during fenestrated or branched endovascular aneurysm repair procedures (51%), activated clotting time (ACT) was employed by a minority (26-31%). A large variety in measurement protocols was observed, yet a target ACT of 200 seconds was most often used for all NCAP types (44-54%). Most vascular specialists considered a heparin follow up dose (61-81%) and heparin reversal using protamine (54-63%), both for a variety of indications. Of the participants, 68% expressed discontent with their current antithrombotic protocol(s). Conclusion: This comprehensive, international survey study revealed large variation among vascular clinical specialists' heparinisation strategies during NCAP. Together with the considerable discontent expressed regarding protocols, this emphasises the urgent need for comparative, randomised studies on antithrombotic management during NCAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.