ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
COVID-19-associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients at 7 US Hospitals: Epidemiology and Estimated Likelihood of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis-Results of the Prospective MSG-017 Study.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Increase in Healthcare-Associated Infections: Is COVID-19 Responsible? A Narrative Review.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Invasive Aspergillosis Complicating Severe COVID-19: Cumulative Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes Between the First Wave of the Pandemic and Subsequent Waves, According to the ECMM/ISHAM Classification and a Local Case Assessment.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: There is no prospective, US multicenter study of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). CAPA definitions do not differentiate invasive aspergillosis (IPA) from colonization. Validity of single mycologic test results is unclear. Methods: We performed a prospective 7-center US study of mechanically ventilated adults with COVID-19 (April 2021-May 2022). Mycoses Study Group (MSGERC) CAPA criteria include host and clinical factors, imaging and test results (histopathology; bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] culture and/or BAL or serum galactomannan-immunoassay). Proven, putative, and unlikely IPA were defined by clinical criteria. CAPA-unlikely IPA criteria included survival or negative autopsy following no/limited antifungal treatment. IPA likelihood was estimated using sensitivity/specificity of tests from autopsy data. Results: CAPA incidence was 7% (14/212). Independent CAPA risk factors were EORTC/MSGERC host factor and cavitary lesions. Seven percent, 79%, and 14% of CAPA patients had proven, putative, and unlikely IPA, respectively. Respective estimated IPA likelihoods were 84%, 7%-99%, and 1%-8%. Overall, median estimated IPA likelihood was 30%. Patients with CAPA-unlikely IPA had a single positive BAL galactomannan-immunoassay with other negative tests. CAPA mortality (71%) was not impacted by antifungal treatment or significantly different than without CAPA. CAPA incidence was 10% and 16% by European Confederation of Medical Mycology and Public Health Wales definitions, respectively. IPA was unlikely in 75% (6/8) and 57% (13/23) diagnosed by these definitions but not MSGERC. Conclusions: CAPA is associated with high mortality, but IPA's contribution is unclear. Single positive tests are insufficient for diagnosing CAPA-IPA. IPA likelihood is best estimated by combining test results (both positive and negative).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.