ArticleCurrent health sciences journal
Using Convoluted Neural Networks in Diagnosing Lung Cancer on Computed Tomography Scans.
Article in Current health sciences journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLung cancer represents a major health issue of the modern world, accounting for both most new cases and highest mortality rates worldwide. Early diagnosis and treatment remain essential in managing the disease; therefore, developing novel computer-assisted tools for processing large quantities of imaging data can prove indispensable. Our aim was to develop a novel convoluted neural network (CNN) to classify lung computed tomography (CT) images of suspect nodules. MATERIALS AND
methodsAfter obtaining ethical clearance, we included consenting patients with a lung mass found on a chest radiography, visible lung tumor on computer tomography and positive pathology or follow-up. After data augmentation, we trained a deep learning model to classify input images into two classes, malignant or benign. We evaluated the model by calculating accuracy, recall and precision.
resultsWe successfully enrolled 176 patients from a total of 192 cases. Most were male (135 cases, accounting for 76.7%) and came from urban areas (111 cases, 63%). Most tumors were found on the right lung (103 cases). The model performed well on an imbalanced dataset, with recall values at 79.31%, while precision reached 62.16%, a training accuracy of 76.34% and a validation accuracy of 77.01%.
conclusionsWe proved that a CNN model can easily be implemented on regular hardware to successfully classify malignant and benign lung lesions on CT images. Future CNN implementations can greatly improve the imaging diagnosis of lung lesions; however, the physicians should always decide the medical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.