ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2025
Comparing Dry Needle Therapy and Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and needling therapy in the treatment of tendinopathy. Data sources: PubMed (Medline), the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from August 5, 2024, to August 25, 2024, for comparative studies of needling therapy and ESWT for the treatment of tendinopathy published between January 1, 2000, and August 5, 2024. Study Selection: Two reviewers independently reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported a comparison of needling therapy and ESWT for tendinopathy for inclusion eligibility. Data Extraction: Outcomes of interest were the visual analog scale (VAS) score and pressure pain threshold (PPT) score. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the included RCTs with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Effect sizes were estimated using mean differences (MDs), and the significance level was estimated using the Data Synthesis: Nine RCTs involving 528 patients were deemed suitable for inclusion. Six RCTs involving 318 patients revealed that VAS scores showed no significant difference between ESWT and dry needling in either the immediate (MD, 0.06; 95% CI, -0.30 to 0.43; Conclusions: This meta-analysis shows that the combination of ESWT with needling therapy is more effective in reducing pain indices in patients with enthesopathy than using ESWT or needling therapy alone. ESWT, combined with needling therapy, should be prioritized for conservative treatment in patients with tendinopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.