ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2025
Underrepresentation of Participants From Marginalized Racial and Ethnic Groups: A Secondary Analysis of the Cognitive Rehabilitation Literature.
Review in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Designing Electronic Problem-Solving Training for Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: Mixed Methods, Community-Based, Participatory Research Case Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of Structured Memory Training on Cognitive Recovery in Stroke Survivors: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Sage open agingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine the inclusion of people with brain injury from racially and ethnically marginalized groups in cognitive rehabilitation clinical trials. Data Sources: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Cicerone et al (2019) cognitive rehabilitation review. Study Selection: Of the originally included studies, we excluded those not conducted in the United States, along with case studies and case series studies. Data Extraction: We extracted data on the racial and ethnic demographics of the study samples, along with eligibility criteria and recruitment and sampling strategies. We examined demographic data descriptively (frequencies and percentages) and examined other study methods thematically. Data Synthesis: Sixty-five studies met criteria for inclusion in this secondary analysis. Of these, only 27 reported on the racial and ethnic demographics of the study samples. In all but 8, White non-Hispanic participants were overrepresented. We identified several frequently employed recruitment strategies and eligibility criteria that may disproportionately exclude participants from minoritized racial and ethnic groups, including English language, literacy, and baseline education requirements, exclusion based on comorbid conditions, and recruitment of participants from existing clinic patient pools. Conclusions: We found notable underrepresentation of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) from racially and ethnically marginalized groups in cognitive rehabilitation clinical trials, which have been used to guide practice and research. This underrepresentation likely exacerbates disparities in rehabilitation access and outcomes among marginalized groups. Further research should seek to comprehensively understand current recruitment and sampling strategies that contribute to this problem and identify opportunities to improve inclusivity in TBI rehabilitation research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.