ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2025
Quantifying At-Home Physiotherapy Participation: SPARS vs Self-Reported Diaries.
Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The completion of at-home physiotherapy exercise is key to many rehabilitation protocols. This study compares at-home upper extremity physiotherapy participation as measured based on data captured with a smart watch to that recorded in self-report diaries. Daily at-home exercise participation (sessions) was recorded for 53 patients with rotator cuff pathology during their first 2 weeks of a 12-week physiotherapy rehabilitation program. Exercise participation was measured using a physical therapy monitoring system that uses smart watch (accelerometer/gyroscope) data analyzed via a convolutional neural network trained on labeled patient-specific in-clinic data and compared to patient reported diaries. A high level of agreement between diary exercise participation and the measurements derived from the smart watch data (ICC=0.72, n=53) was found, with an AUROC=0.99 for binary identification of exercise periods on labeled clinic data. However, overall patient diaries reported more exercise performed (0.96 additional days on average) than measured by the ML algorithm. ML and accelerometer/gyroscope data collected by embedded sensors in a smartwatch represents an accurate and objective alternative to self-reported diaries for monitoring patient at-home participation. Lower levels recorded by the ML algorithm may indicate some limitations in the technology to fully capture participation or potential over-reporting of participation within diaries. As self-reported diary completion decreases over time, physical therapy monitoring technology may represent an acceptable method for longer term assessment of exercise participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.