Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678272›Full record

ArticleAnnual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics2024

Ecology and evolution of the social microbiome.

Reena Debray, Jenny Tung, Elizabeth A Archie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Reena DebrayDepartment of Primate Behavior and Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8130-4871
Jenny TungDepartment of Primate Behavior and Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Duke Population Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0416-2958
Elizabeth A ArchieDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1187-0998

Funding

A life course perspective on gut microbiome aging and health in a non-human primate modelR01AG071684 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI ARCHIE, ELIZABETH · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG071684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals with close social relationships often have similar microbiomes. These socially structured microbiomes can arise through multiple mechanisms that are often difficult to disentangle, including transmission between social partners or via socially structured, shared environments. Here, we review evidence for socially structured microbiomes and propose methods to differentiate the mechanisms that given rise to them. We discuss the evolutionary implications of these mechanisms for both hosts and their microbiomes, including the possibility that social transmission selects for host-specialized microbiomes. We conclude by identifying outstanding questions related to social microbiomes and their implications for social evolution. We identify new or underutilized approaches like longitudinal study designs, strain sharing analysis, and culture-based characterization to address these outstanding questions.

Indexed as

coevolutiongroup livinghorizontal transmissionmicrobial transmissionsocial behaviorsocial network

Identifiers

PMID40678272
PMCPMC12269742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.