ArticleJPRAS open2025
Applying machine learning to safe vascular anastomosis.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vision-Capable LLMs in Microsurgery: A Blinded Comparison of Two AI Models with Expert Microsurgeons in the Appraisal of 200 Experimental Anastomoses.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Machine-learning technology is currently being introduced into the medical field and has been shown to aid diagnostic imaging, patient examinations, patient-data analysis, various surgical aspects, and medical education. Recent advances in exoscopes and monitors are prompting a shift from optical microscope-based microsurgery to heads-up microsurgery. The high-definition exoscope images are highly suitable for machine learning. Since an algorithm that detects predictive signs of thrombus formation would aid microsurgery and help train surgeons to identify vessels at risk of unsafe microvascular anastomosis, we here asked whether we could use exoscope images to train such a machine-learning algorithm. Methods: Arterial clots, intimal-wall damage, debris, and stumps in 9150 ORBEYE™ exoscope images of arterial anastomosis obtained in 2023-2024 were annotated with RectLabel pro™. These images were used to train the You Only Look Once (YOLO) model (Ultralytics) to detect the thrombus-predicting signs. The YOLO code was executed within Google Colaboratory™. Results: After algorithm training for 100 epochs, the four objects were detected in real time, albeit with high levels of false-positive and false-negative detections. Conclusion: Our study shows the potential of machine learning on exoscope images to generate algorithms that promote safe microsurgical anastomosis. It also shows how the recent emergence of Python code, Google Colaboratory™, and machine-learning models such as YOLO has made it possible for even programming amateurs to develop effective machine-learning algorithms. Further development of new central and graphics processing units and computational processing methods will likely lead to machine-learning applications that improve surgery and facilitate medical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.