ArticleIn silico pharmacology2025
Inward opening (IO) to outward opening (OO) 'catalytic transition' and OO to IO 'relaxation' of P-glycoprotein: to investigate the role of helices in efflux through targeted molecular dynamics simulation.
Article in In silico pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is a membrane protein that effluxes xenobiotics across cell membranes via ATP hydrolysis. It is overexpressed mainly in cancer cells and is responsible for multidrug resistance by effluxing chemotherapeutic molecules. To unearth the coordinated mechanism and function of different domains i.e., nucleotide binding domain (NBD), transmembrane domain (TMD) and transmembrane helices (TMHs) in catalysis, human P-gp was modelled in Inward Opening (IO) and Outward Opening (OO) states and further subjected to targeted molecular dynamics (tMD) simulations. Structural transition frames between IO ⇌ OO were obtained from the clustering of tMD simulation trajectories. Protein model quality scores (ProSA Z-scores) were evaluated for conformational states. The results showed that the IO → OO transition is an energetically uphill process requiring a major structural transition involving 131 distinct conformational states, coupled with ATP hydrolysis. In contrast, the OO → IO relaxation, crucial for resetting the transporter, does not follow the same transition pathway and is an energetically downhill process involving only 90 states, indicating a faster and distinct mechanism. The helix pairs 1&7 and 6&12 are observed to be relatively static, forming the core of the TMD, while pairs 3&9 and 4&10 are moderately dynamic, and pairs 5&11 and 2&8 are highly dynamic, located more peripherally. The static and dynamic nature and position of these helix pairs justify their respective roles in substrate binding and efflux, and these findings may provide insight into the design and development of next-generation P-gp inhibitors. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40203-025-00389-3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.