ArticleResearch square2025
Three-dimensional assessment of finger individuation reveals finger- and joint-specific selective motor control deficits in pediatric cerebral palsy.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Children with cerebral palsy (CP) exhibit impaired selective motor control (SMC) that contributes to poor hand function, but current clinical assessments lack the sensitivity to detect finger- and joint-specific deficits to guide rehabilitation strategies. This study aimed to determine the internal consistency and validity of an objective, instrumented assessment of selective finger control (individuation) in children with CP, and to examine its relationship to clinical measures of upper limb function. Methods: A custom-designed device recorded 3-dimensional isometric forces concurrently from all five fingertips to compute a composite metric of finger SMC (Individuation Index) for each tested finger and force direction. Group differences in individuation ability were quantified using linear mixed-effect models. Relationships between individuation and clinical assessments were assessed with age-controlled partial Pearson correlation. Results: Twenty-eight children with CP and 18 typically developing control children were included. The non-preferred arm was tested in most children with CP (n = 16), with the preferred arm tested in controls and the remaining CP cohort. Individuation Indexes demonstrated excellent internal consistency across groups (all Conclusions: This study provides a consistent, valid, and sensitive method to quantify finger SMC in children with CP, revealing finger-, force direction-, and hand-specific impairments that highlight aspects of dexterity not captured by clinical assessments. Quantifying finger individuation enables more precise characterization of hand dysfunction, advancing mechanistic understanding and targeted intervention design for children with CP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.