Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678208›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

The Water Insecurity Experiences (WISE) Scales are suitable for use in high-income settings: findings from cognitive interviews and nationally representative surveys.

Sera L Young, Joshua D Miller, Indira Bose, Shalean Collins, Sarah Danaj, Boris Kazakov, Ben Pauli, Aleksandra Ravnachka, Adam Ritchie, Kelsey Rydland and 5 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sera L YoungNorthwestern University.
Joshua D MillerUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Indira BoseLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
Shalean CollinsTulane University.
Sarah DanajKettering University.
Boris KazakovBulgarian Academy of Sciences.
Ben PauliKettering University.
Aleksandra RavnachkaNeofit Rilski, South-West University of Blagoevgrad.
Adam RitchieKettering University.
Kelsey RydlandUniversity Libraries, Northwestern University.
Benjamin SefcovicKettering University.
Chad StaddonUniversity of the West of England.
Sophia StaddonIndependent Scholar.
Jaynie VonkOxfam.
Edward A FrongilloUniversity of South Carolina.

Funding

Differential impacts of water insecurity on diet and body composition throughout the life courseF31HD113400 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MILLER, JOSHUA D · 2023 to 2024
$81k
Gates Foundation INV-002962NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD113400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Water Insecurity Experiences Scales are validated tools for reliably and comparably assessing experiences with water access and use in low- and middle-income countries. Although theoretically applicable in high-income countries, their performance in these settings has not been assessed. This study therefore examined whether the Water Insecurity Experiences Scales function similarly in high-income countries, and if they generated measures comparable to those in low- and middle-income countries. Methods: We conducted cognitive interviews with 73 adults from 4 high-income countries (Bulgaria, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States) to assess whether participants understood the items in the Individual Water Insecurity Experiences Scale as intended. We then used nationally representative Gallup World Poll data from two high-income countries (Australia, the United States) and three low- and middle-income countries (Bangladesh, Brazil, and Uganda) to evaluate internal consistency, unidimensionality, and measurement invariance (n = 4,928).Construct validity was assessed by testing hypothesized associations between water insecurity scores and wealth, household size, self-reported stress, and satisfaction with water quality within Australia and the United States. Results: Cognitive interviews revealed no major issues with item translation or comprehension, supporting construct equivalence. The prevalence of moderate-to-high water insecurity was low in Australia (3.7%) and the United States (1.0%). In both countries, the scale was internally consistent, conformed to the unidimensional structure, and demonstrated good model fit based on criteria established Conclusions: The Individual Water Insecurity Experiences Scale performs well in high-income countries and yields cross-country comparable measures, supporting its use for global monitoring of water insecurity.

Indexed as

high-income countrieslow- and middle-income countriesmeasurement equivalencescale developmentvalidationwater insecurity

Identifiers

PMID40678208
PMCPMC12270218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.