ArticleJB & JS open access
Finite Element Analysis of Patellofemoral Contact Pressure with Varying Fixation of Transverse Patella Fractures.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Understanding patellofemoral contact pressure is crucial for knee biomechanics, as abnormalities can lead to joint issues. This study investigates the changes in contact pressure after surgical fixation of patellar fractures. Methods: Finite element model of the knee was created using cadaveric data on transverse patellar fractures. Models were analyzed and evaluated at 0°, 45°, and 90° flexion under quadriceps force to assess peak pressure, contact pattern, and pressure irregularity. Results: The plate and wire fixation models exhibited distinct stress distribution patterns at 45° and 90° flexion angles. At 45°, the plate model had a higher peak stress (6.14 MPa) in a 21.0-mm ovular contact area, while the wire model had lower peak stress (2.42 MPa) in a smaller, more fragmented region. At 90°, the plate model exhibited concentrated stress (13.26 MPa) in a heart-shaped area, whereas the wire model had 3 dispersed stress points (9.88 MPa) over a broader surface. These findings highlight the plate model's greater stress concentration and the wire model's more irregular distribution of stress. At 0°, the plate model exhibited minimal contact pressure compared with the wire model, with a pressure of 6.67 MPa. Conclusion: The plate model better preserves patellofemoral biomechanics, potentially reducing complications and improving long-term outcomes. Further research is needed to confirm its superiority as a fixation method. Clinical Relevance: Although the prevalence of patellar fractures remains high, the gold-standard method for surgical fixation has a postoperative complication rate as high as 52.5%. Addressing the lack of understanding surrounding patellofemoral contact pressure in this scenario is an essential step toward improving outcomes for these patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.