ArticleAdvances in ophthalmology practice and research
Comparing benzodiazepine-ketamine and benzodiazepine-fentanyl sedation in phacoemulsification: A double-blind crossover non-inferiority clinical trial (BEKEF study).
Article in Advances in ophthalmology practice and research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Topical anesthesia for cataract surgery often requires adjunctive sedation to manage intraoperative discomfort and improve patient cooperation. Ketamine and fentanyl, combined with benzodiazepines, are commonly used sedation regimens, but their comparative safety and efficacy in the cataract surgery context remain underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate whether ketamine combined with midazolam is non-inferior to fentanyl combined with midazolam for sedation during phacoemulsification, with a non-inferiority margin of 10%. Methods: This prospective, double-blind, crossover, non-inferiority trial randomized 75 patients to receive both sedation regimens for bilateral phacoemulsification. A 15-day washout period was implemented between surgeries. Adequate sedation was defined as a Ramsay Sedation Scale score of 2-3. The primary outcome was sedation adequacy, with secondary outcomes including patient and surgeon satisfaction, surgical metrics, and complications. Results: Of the 75 randomized patients, 65 (130 eyes) completed the study. Adequate sedation was achieved in 86.2% of cases with ketamine and 89.2% with fentanyl, with a within-participant difference of 3.1% (95% CI: -2.3%-5.3%), confirming non-inferiority. Patient satisfaction scores were similarly high between regimens (ketamine: 4.87 ± 0.36; fentanyl: 4.91 ± 0.28; Conclusions: Ketamine combined with midazolam is a safe and effective alternative to fentanyl-based sedation for cataract surgery, providing comparable sedation quality and satisfaction. These findings support ketamine's use in cataract surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.