Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678186›Full record

ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2025

The combined effects of motor imagery and motor practice are influenced by differences in working memory function: Examination of brain, spinal cord, and muscle performance data.

Yuki Fukumoto, Hiroki Bizen, Marina Todo, Naoki Yoshida, Toshiaki Suzuki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuki FukumotoKansai University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physical Therapy, 2-11-1 Wakaba Sennangun Kumatori, Osaka 590-0482, Japan.
Hiroki BizenKansai University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Occupational Therapy, 2-11-1 Wakaba Sennangun Kumatori, Osaka 590-0482, Japan.
Marina TodoKansai University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physical Therapy, 2-11-1 Wakaba Sennangun Kumatori, Osaka 590-0482, Japan.
Naoki YoshidaGraduate School of Kansai University of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Health Sciences, 2-11-1 Wakaba Sennangun Kumatori, Osaka 590-0482, Japan.
Toshiaki SuzukiKansai University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physical Therapy, 2-11-1 Wakaba Sennangun Kumatori, Osaka 590-0482, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to perform motor imagery is affected by differences in short-term memory storage capacity in terms of the activation of working memory. Therefore, from the viewpoint of the simultaneous measurement of brain activation and spinal motor neuron excitability, we examined differences in the combined effects of motor practice and motor imagery due to differences in working memory function. 20 healthy individuals were classified into Normal (score of ≤5-6 digits) and Good (score of ≥7 digits) groups based on working memory in a digit span test. Following this, participants performed six sets of repetitive exercises combining motor practice and motor imagery, and changes in neural activity patterns in the brain and spinal cord, as well as changes in finger dexterity, were tracked. In brain network analysis, the first execution of the imagery showed high Betweenness Centrality in the frontal pole cortex, which shifted to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with repeated imagery. The involvement of the frontal pole may reflect introspection of motor behavior in the initial stage, while the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex consistently participated in imagery generation throughout the entire motor imagery process. In addition, both groups showed improvement in finger dexterity after intervention, but during repetitive motor imagery, a decrease in amplitude F/M ratio was observed in the Good Working Memory group, and a decrease in activation of the right primary motor cortex was observed in the Normal Working Memory group. In terms of working memory, especially in aspects of the phonological loop, those with higher function may execute motor imagery more distinctly.

Indexed as

Finger dexterityF-wavesMotor imageryMotor learningOxy-hb

Identifiers

PMID40678186
PMCPMC12269422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.