Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678169›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2025

Determinants for Aggressive Discoid Lateral Meniscus Saucerization: Evidence for Bias or Just Experience?

Emily G Pedrick, James D Bomar, Roland A Howard, Eric W Edmonds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily G PedrickDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
James D BomarDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital-San Deigo, CA, USA.
Roland A HowardDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Eric W EdmondsDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital-San Deigo, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the setting of discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) surgery, the amount of discoid tissue to resect may depend on several factors. The goal of this study is to determine whether the amount of DLM resection during saucerization is impacted by surgeon implicit bias. Methods: A retrospective review of patient demographic information, including race, ethnicity, state normalized child opportunity index (COI), and preferred language, was performed on patients who underwent surgery for discoid lateral meniscus. Treating surgeons were grouped according to experience (trained before or after the popularity of all-inside repair implantation devices). Static arthroscopic images were utilized to detail the meniscus based on a modified Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine (PRiSM) DLM classification system, as well as to record the amount of resection performed. A multivariate generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was used to evaluate risk factors. Results: 295 children (315 knees) met criteria with a mean age at surgery of 13.2 ± 3.6 years (range: 2.6-21.5 years). 64.1% were Hispanic, and 57.1% had government insurance. Patients managed by more experienced surgeons were 4.6 times more likely to be treated with more aggressive saucerization ( Conclusion: The PRiSM DLM classification appears to differentiate the extent of discoid saucerization utilized during surgery; however, neither patient race nor ethnicity was a significant predictor. There is a potential unconscious bias related to surgeon experience, as those with more experience tended to be more aggressive with saucerization than surgeons who trained more recently. The positive or negative nature of this bias requires a future long-term outcome study. Key Concepts: (1)The PRiSM DLM classification appears to differentiate the extent of discoid saucerization utilized during surgery.(2)There is a potential unconscious bias related to surgeon experience, as those with more experience tended to be more aggressive with saucerization than surgeons who trained more recently.(3)Abnormal meniscal height, unstable menisci, non-horizontal tears, and tears extending into both the anterior and posterior zones were found to be treated with more aggressive saucerization. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective study.

Indexed as

Discoid lateral meniscusImplicit biasPRiSM discoid meniscus classification system

Identifiers

PMID40678169
PMCPMC12270603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.