ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2025
Development and Internal Validation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Subsequent Contralateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in Patients With Unilateral Slips.
Article in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Controversy remains about whether to pin the contralateral side in cases of unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Machine learning (ML) algorithms can be leveraged to identify complex, nonlinear patterns in data and allow for more accurate predictions on which patients may need a prophylactic pin. The goal of this study was to use ML to develop a predictive model for contralateral SCFE using previously established risk factors as well as emerging radiographic measures. Methods: This retrospective study from two large centers included all patients aged <18 years treated for unilateral SCFE between 2000 and 2022 with at least 18 months' follow-up. Those with incomplete records or bilateral SCFE were excluded. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were collected. Patients were divided into a unilateral pin or contralateral slip cohort. Significant relationships between groups were used for feature selection in the predictive model. Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated to determine optimal thresholds for significant continuous variables. ML models were compared using area under the curve (AUC) and weighted F1score. Results: There were 604 patients who met inclusion criteria. Of these, 389 (64%) patients needed no further intervention after unilateral pinning, 100 (17%) developed a contralateral slip, and 115 (19%) were prophylactically pinned. Compared to those who needed no further intervention, patients with a subsequent slip were significantly younger (12.2 vs 12.6 yrs, Conclusions: ECR is a significant radiographic predictor of contralateral SCFE. Our preliminary ML model shows early promise in predicting contralateral SCFE, but more data are required. Key Concepts: (1)This study is, to our knowledge, the first to apply emerging machine learning (ML) techniques to address the indications for prophylactic pinning of the unaffected side in patients presenting with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE).(2)Our preliminary ML model predicts development of a contralateral slip with reasonable accuracy. Our final model reported an area under the curve of 0.66 and a weighted F1-score of 0.77.(3)Epiphyseal cupping ratio is the most significant radiographic predictor of contralateral SCFE. Level of Evidence: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.