Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678152›Full record

ArticleStatistics in biosciences2025

Efficiency loss with binary pre-processing of continuous monitoring data.

Paula R Langner, Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga, Lucas N Marzec, Gary K Grunwald, John D Rice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paula R LangnerDenver/Seattle Center of Innovation, Department of Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, 1700 North Wheeling Street, Aurora, 80045, CO, USA.
Elizabeth Juarez-ColungaDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 East 17th Place, Aurora, 80045, CO, USA.
Lucas N MarzecDepartment of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, 280 Exempla Circle, Lafayette, 80026, CO, USA.
Gary K GrunwaldDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 East 17th Place, Aurora, 80045, CO, USA.
John D RiceDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, 84109, MI, USA.

Funding

Modeling seizures in patients with focal epilepsyR01NS133040 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI JACQUELINE A. FRENCH, Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS133040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In studies with a recurrent event outcome, events may be captured as counts during subsequent intervals or follow-up times either by design or for ease of analysis. In many cases, recurrent events may be further coarsened such that only an indicator of one or more events in an interval is observed at the follow-up time, resulting in a loss of information relative to a record of all events. In this paper, we examine efficiency loss when coarsening longitudinally observed counts to binary indicators and aspects of the design which impact the ability to estimate a treatment effect of interest. The investigation was motivated by a study of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices in which investigators aimed to examine the effect of a treatment on events detected by the devices over time. In order to study components of such a recurrent event process impacted by data coarsening, we derive the asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) of a treatment effect estimator utilizing a coarsened binary outcome relative to an alternative estimator using the count outcome. We compare the efficiencies and consider conditions where the binary process maintains good efficiency in estimating a treatment effect. We present an application of the methods to a data set consisting of seizure counts in a sample of patients with epilepsy.

Indexed as

Counting processLongitudinal data analysisPanel countPoisson process

Identifiers

PMID40678152
PMCPMC12266715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.