ArticleStatistics in biosciences2025
Efficiency loss with binary pre-processing of continuous monitoring data.
Article in Statistics in biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In studies with a recurrent event outcome, events may be captured as counts during subsequent intervals or follow-up times either by design or for ease of analysis. In many cases, recurrent events may be further coarsened such that only an indicator of one or more events in an interval is observed at the follow-up time, resulting in a loss of information relative to a record of all events. In this paper, we examine efficiency loss when coarsening longitudinally observed counts to binary indicators and aspects of the design which impact the ability to estimate a treatment effect of interest. The investigation was motivated by a study of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices in which investigators aimed to examine the effect of a treatment on events detected by the devices over time. In order to study components of such a recurrent event process impacted by data coarsening, we derive the asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) of a treatment effect estimator utilizing a coarsened binary outcome relative to an alternative estimator using the count outcome. We compare the efficiencies and consider conditions where the binary process maintains good efficiency in estimating a treatment effect. We present an application of the methods to a data set consisting of seizure counts in a sample of patients with epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.