ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
Myocardial-to-background ratio in F18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET in cardiac sarcoidosis for diagnosis and evaluation of therapeutic response.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Objectives: FDG uptake parameters were investigated semi-quantitatively in biopsy-proven CS at time of diagnosis (CSD) and during immunosuppressive therapy (CST) and in controls. Methods: We studied 11 patients with endomyocardial biopsy-proven CS and 15 controls. FDG uptake was assessed as myocardial-to-background ratio (MBR) of standardized uptake values in the 17-segment model and right ventricle in relation to clinical baseline parameters and changes during follow-up (FU). Results: MBRs per cardiac segment in controls were below 2.1 in all control patients. In CSD, median MBR was 2.4 (IQR 1.3; 4.0), highest septal and anterobasal. In CST, median MBR was 1.5 (IQR 1.1; 1.7) with a significant reduction of mean MBRs from baseline per cardiac segment (z -9.5, p < 0.001). Patients with clinical progress showed higher MBRs and more affected cardiac segments before therapy (n = 2, MBR 4.3 ± 3.0, 18.0 ± 0) than patients with stable disease (n = 5, MBR 2.8 ± 1.2, 14.4 ± 4.6) or clinical improvement (n = 4, MBR 2.6 ± 2.5, 8.0 ± 7.4, p = n.s.) Applying a new score based on mean MBR times number of involved segments showed highest values in patients with clinical progression. Conclusion: MBRs per cardiac segment can be used as a semiquantitative tool to evaluate FDG uptake in patients with CS with a cut-off ≥2.1 for relevant pathologic uptake. The clinical course may correlate with the number of affected cardiac segments and the MBRs per segment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.