Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678124›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025

Myocardial-to-background ratio in F18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET in cardiac sarcoidosis for diagnosis and evaluation of therapeutic response.

Laura Ueberham, Theresa Kluge, Konrad Latuscynski, Hans Ebbinghaus, Joanna Jozwiak-Nozdrzykowska, Stephan Renziehausen, Annika Reuser, Kerstin Bode, Regine Kluge, Ulrich Laufs and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Laura UeberhamUniversitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Liebigstraße 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Theresa KlugeUniversitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Liebigstraße 18, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Konrad LatuscynskiDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Struempellstraße 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Hans EbbinghausDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Struempellstraße 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Joanna Jozwiak-NozdrzykowskaDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Struempellstraße 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Stephan RenziehausenUniversitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Liebigstraße 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Annika ReuserUniversitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Liebigstraße 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Kerstin BodeDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Struempellstraße 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Regine KlugeUniversitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Liebigstraße 18, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Ulrich LaufsUniversitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Liebigstraße 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Osama SabriUniversitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Liebigstraße 18, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Borislav DinovDepartment of Internal Medicine I: Cardiology and Angiology, University of Giessen and Marburg, Klinikstraße 33, 35392 Gießen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Objectives: FDG uptake parameters were investigated semi-quantitatively in biopsy-proven CS at time of diagnosis (CSD) and during immunosuppressive therapy (CST) and in controls. Methods: We studied 11 patients with endomyocardial biopsy-proven CS and 15 controls. FDG uptake was assessed as myocardial-to-background ratio (MBR) of standardized uptake values in the 17-segment model and right ventricle in relation to clinical baseline parameters and changes during follow-up (FU). Results: MBRs per cardiac segment in controls were below 2.1 in all control patients. In CSD, median MBR was 2.4 (IQR 1.3; 4.0), highest septal and anterobasal. In CST, median MBR was 1.5 (IQR 1.1; 1.7) with a significant reduction of mean MBRs from baseline per cardiac segment (z -9.5, p < 0.001). Patients with clinical progress showed higher MBRs and more affected cardiac segments before therapy (n = 2, MBR 4.3 ± 3.0, 18.0 ± 0) than patients with stable disease (n = 5, MBR 2.8 ± 1.2, 14.4 ± 4.6) or clinical improvement (n = 4, MBR 2.6 ± 2.5, 8.0 ± 7.4, p = n.s.) Applying a new score based on mean MBR times number of involved segments showed highest values in patients with clinical progression. Conclusion: MBRs per cardiac segment can be used as a semiquantitative tool to evaluate FDG uptake in patients with CS with a cut-off ≥2.1 for relevant pathologic uptake. The clinical course may correlate with the number of affected cardiac segments and the MBRs per segment.

Indexed as

Cardiac sarcoidosisMyocardial-background-ratioPET CTResponse to immunosuppressive therapy

Identifiers

PMID40678124
PMCPMC12270610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.