ReviewBasic and clinical neuroscience2025
Bibliometric Analysis of Craving in Drug and Behavioral Addiction During the Last Decade.
Review in Basic and clinical neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: According to the review studies, the growing knowledge of craving and the relevant causal factors that have led to the accumulation of solid theoretical frameworks over the past few years make it necessary to carry out a bibliometric review of this literature. Methods: In this study, by examining the papers published during the last decade in the Scopus database, the largest citation database functional in mapping and content analysis of citation data, the researchers tried to clarify the research direction in the coming years. Results: In craving research, multi-authored articles, such as Boswell's (2016) study, garnered the highest number of citations. Boswell (2016) and Wolff (2016) have emerged as prominent figures in this field. Li X and the journal of addictive behaviors are leading producers of research in the craving domain. The highest volume of scientific output originates from the Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, with significant contributions from the United States, China, Germany, Italy, and England. The term "craving" exhibits the highest frequency of use. The co-authorship network illustrates that the most significant collaborations occur between the United States and other countries, where the majority of scientific output in this field is concentrated. Conclusion: This analysis leads to the conclusion that studies about cravings occupy a prominent position in global etiological research and therapeutic interventions for addictive disorders. The enduring popularity of authors and publications addressing these disorders remains noteworthy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.