Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678094›Full record

ArticleBasic and clinical neuroscience2025

Electroencephalography Oscillations During Prehypnosis and Hypnosis in Subjects With High and Low Dissociative Experiences.

Hoda Taghilou, Mazaher Rezaei, Mohammad Ali Nazari, Alireza Valizadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Basic and clinical neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hoda TaghilouDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2302-0026
Mazaher RezaeiDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Medicine, Beheshti Hospital, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3568-1796
Mohammad Ali NazariDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0340-994X
Alireza ValizadehDepartment of Physics, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS), Zanjan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hypnosis is a multifaceted phenomenon that refers to suggestions for creating desirable behavior, experience, and physiological changes. Most electroencephalographic (EEG) research in hypnosis has allocated people into two groups of high and low hypnotizables. Hence, the empirical data are somewhat controversial, and there is no general agreement about the neurophysiology of hypnosis. On the other hand, the dissociation theory of hypnosis posits that people candidates for hypnosis are typically prone to dissociation, and individuals divide into two groups: High dissociative (HD) and low dissociative (LD). If this assumption is true, such a state should be visible as a distinct pattern of changes in absolute power and functional connectivity between brain districts after a hypnotic induction in high but not in LD suggestible. Methods: The final sample consisted of 20 participants who scored 6 or higher on the Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale form C (SHSS: C). Then, we completed dissociative experiences scales (DES) on them. To assess the brain's electrical activity during hypnosis, a 19-channel EEG was recorded from 10 HD and 10 LD participants with their eyes closed before (baseline) and after the induction of hypnosis. We used EEG to measure absolute power and functional connectivity using coherence. We expected the two groups to have dissimilar EEG signal patterns despite equivalent hypnotizability. Results: We found that in the delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands, both groups were different from the baseline to hypnosis. In addition, both groups showed different connectivity in hypnosis in four bands (delta, theta, alpha, and beta). Conclusion: These findings indicate that although the LD and HD groups had equal hypnotizability, the episodic prospection tasks did not involve the same neural networks in the two groups.

Indexed as

Dissociative experiencesElectroencephalography (EEG)Gamma oscillationsHypnosisHypnotizability

Identifiers

PMID40678094
PMCPMC12265433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.