ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025
Ideal Nasal Angle Preferences Among Japanese People: A Prospective Observational Study on Aesthetic Perception.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nasal Aesthetic Preferences Across Populations: A Systematic Review of Cultural, Ethnic, and Generational Trends.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aesthetic ideal of the nose varies across nationalities and cultures, making it challenging to define an "ideal" nasal shape in rhinoplasty. Objectives: The authors of this study aimed to provide foundational data for generalizable aesthetic standards for nasal surgery in Japanese individuals. Methods: A randomly selected group of 783 Japanese adults was presented with digitally modified images depicting 12 nasolabial and nasofacial angles. Aesthetic evaluations were conducted using Google Forms or paper surveys. The images were categorized into 3 groups: "aesthetic," "average," and "not aesthetic." Statistical analysis was conducted using JMP software. To minimize bias, the order in which the images were presented was randomized. The Steel-Dwass test was used to assess statistically significant differences between angles. Results: For men, a nasolabial angle of 95° and a nasofacial angle of 33° were rated as aesthetic, whereas for women, a nasolabial angle of 105° and a nasofacial angle of 30° were considered favorable. The results indicate a preference for sharper nasolabial angles in men and slightly obtuse angles in women. When calculating the ideal angles using the weighted average, the ideal nasolabial angle for men was 105° and the ideal nasofacial angle was 30°. For women, the ideal nasolabial and nasofacial angles were 105° and 30°, respectively. Conclusions: The authors of this study highlight sex-specific nasal preferences within the Japanese population and emphasize the importance of tailoring rhinoplasty procedures to demographic factors. Level of Evidence 5 Therapeutic:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.