ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2025
Anthropomorphic tissue-mimicking phantoms for oximetry validation in multispectral optical imaging.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- In-silico investigation into optimal photoacoustic probe design using a digital thyroid phantom.Journal of biomedical optics · 2027Article
- Optical phantoms for the characterization and validation of imaging and spectroscopy: a review.Biophotonics discovery · 2026Review
- Impact of skin pigmentation on photoacoustic tomography: a phantom study.Biophotonics discovery · 2026Article
- Visual appearance of blood vessels: a phantom study.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Potential of photoacoustic imaging for assessing tumor perfusion in intraocular tumors and high-resolution choroidal microvascular imaging: from technical advances to clinical translation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Optical finger phantom with realistic optical properties.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Optical imaging of blood oxygenation ( Aim: To enable quantitative testing of multispectral imaging methods for assessment of Approach: We used the stable copolymer-in-oil base material to create physical anthropomorphic structures and optimized dyes to mimic the optical absorption of blood across a wide spectral range. Using 3D-printed phantom molds generated from a magnetic resonance image of a human forearm, we molded the material into an anthropomorphic shape. Using both reflectance hyperspectral imaging (HSI) and photoacoustic tomography (PAT), we acquired images of the forearm phantoms and evaluated the performance of linear spectral unmixing (LSU). Results: Based on 10 fabricated forearm phantoms with vessel-like structures featuring five distinct Conclusions: Our anthropomorphic tissue-mimicking phantoms hold potential to provide a robust tool for developing, standardising, and validating optical imaging of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.