ReviewReumatologia2025
When can calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease be considered a polymyalgia rheumatica mimicking disease?
Review in Reumatologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Age and neutrophil counts at the time of diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatica: are they useful or confounding factors in the geriatrician's clinical practice?European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Similarly to polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease is common among older people. Calcium pyrophosphate deposition can present in several forms, including proximal manifestations associated with raised inflammatory markers. Consequently, CPPD disease may be diagnosed as PMR. Recently, a European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology and American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) collaborative initiative proposed new classification criteria for symptomatic CPPD disease. This review paper aimed to discuss when CPPD disease could be considered a PMR-mimicking disease in the light of these criteria. Material and methods: We performed a non-systematic literature search on PubMed, regardless of the language. Abstracts submitted at conferences or from non-peer-reviewed sources were not included. Results: The prevalence of CPPD among patients categorized as having PMR supported the inclusion of CPPD among the PMR-like diseases. However, CPPD disease was not diagnosed among the 169 subjects in the non-PMR comparison group in the 2012 EULAR/ACR classification proposal for PMR. According to the 2023 EULAR/ACR study design for symptomatic CPPD, within the 148 definite mimickers forming the derivation cohort, 6 were affected by PMR; only one was affected by PMR within the 162 definite mimickers forming the validation cohort. Finally, in all the studies on this topic, no patient with PMR and CPPD was reported to have a late diagnosis of giant cell arteritis, at least within the term of follow-up of each study. Conclusions: The relationship between PMR and CPPD should be reviewed in light of the 2023 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for symptomatic CPPD disease. Applying these 2023 criteria, we were able to identify three possible scenarios in patients categorized as having PMR according to the 2012 EULAR/ACR criteria: 1) polymyalgic manifestations in patients with already diagnosed CPPD disease (PMR/CPPD or pseudo-PMR CPPD pattern); 2) polymyalgic manifestations categorized as PMR in patients with concurrent diagnosed CPPD disease (symptomatic CPPD with overlapping PMR); 3) polymyalgic manifestations categorized as PMR in patients with undiagnosed chronic CPPD disease (PMR with concurrent undiagnosed CPPD). Further studies are additionally required to confirm the possibility that the PMR/CPPD subset may be a non-vasculitic pattern of disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.