ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2025
Methotrexate-induced neurotoxicity: Diagnostic challenges and the role of neurophysiological testing.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methotrexate (MTX) is widely used in the treatment of acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) and other onco-hematological conditions. Although subacute MTX-related neurotoxicity is relatively rare, it can present with dramatic, fluctuating neurological deficits that mimic other serious conditions. Diagnosis may be complicated by the frequent presence of asymptomatic white matter abnormalities on MRI, commonly attributed to chronic MTX toxicity. We report an 18-year-old ALL patient who developed severe, fluctuating neurological symptoms 11 days after the third intrathecal administration of MTX. MRI showed bilateral, symmetric diffusion-restrictive white matter lesions. Absent cortical motor evoked potentials (MEPs) with preserved responses to spinal stimulation indicated corticospinal tract involvement localized to the brain, supporting a diagnosis of MTX-induced neurotoxicity. Treatment with high-dose dextromethorphan led to rapid and complete recovery. This case underscores the value of early neurophysiological testing - particularly MEPs - in identifying corticospinal tract involvement and differentiating symptomatic neurotoxicity from chronic, asymptomatic MRI findings. Prompt recognition can accelerate diagnosis, guide treatment, and prevent unnecessary interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.