Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678010›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025

Translation and validation of the Chinese version of quality of physician-patient interaction scale.

Jing Li, Thitipong Tankumpuan, Aurawamon Sriyuktasuth, Patricia M Davidson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jing LiMahidol University, Faculty of Nursing, 2 Wang Lang Road, Siriraj, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok 10700 Thailand.
Thitipong TankumpuanMahidol University, Faculty of Nursing, 2 Wang Lang Road, Siriraj, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok 10700 Thailand.
Aurawamon SriyuktasuthMahidol University, Faculty of Nursing, 2 Wang Lang Road, Siriraj, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok 10700 Thailand.
Patricia M DavidsonUniversity of New South Wales, NSW 2052 Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While the importance of outpatient physician-patient interaction is increasingly recognized, there remains a lack of effective tools to assess these interactions in mainland China. This gap limits our understanding of the nuances in outpatient physician-patient interactions. Objective: This study aimed to translate the Questionnaire on the Quality of Physician-Patient Interaction (QQPPI) into Chinese and validate its effectiveness in assessing the quality of outpatient physician-patient interactions. Methods: This study recruited 466 outpatients using convenience sampling and was conducted in four phases: (1) translation and back-translation to develop the Chinese version of the QQPPI (QQPPI-C); (2) expert review for cultural and contextual relevance; (3) psychometric validation, including exploratory factor analysis on 140 participants and confirmatory factor analysis, measurement invariance, and convergent validity on the remaining 326; and (4) internal consistency assessment using Cronbach's α and Guttman's λ₄. Results: Among the 466 participants (mean age 48.89 ± 14.93 years; 50.2 % male), 140 were randomly assigned for exploratory factor analysis, which supported a unidimensional scale structure explaining 52.12 % of the variance. The remaining 326 participants were used for confirmatory factor analysis and other validity assessments. confirmatory factor analysis indicated good model fit (χ²/df = 2.338, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.064, Incremental Fit Index = 0.937, Comparative Fit Index = 0.963, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.955, and Root Mean Square Residual = 0.031). The QQPPI-C showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.939, Guttman's λ₄= 0.940), high content validity (scale-level content validity index = 0.968), adequate convergent validity, and measurement invariance across genders. Conclusions: The QQPPI-C is a reliable and valid tool for assessing outpatient physician-patient interaction quality in China. Its use can support clinical communication improvement and research on patient-centered care.

Indexed as

Convergent validityMeasurement invariancePhysician–patient interactionReliabilityScale translationValidity

Identifiers

PMID40678010
PMCPMC12268661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.